Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Knut Anders Hatlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>> >>> >>>> I did some experimenting, and here are the results: >>>> Alt A: With maint=0000001 and beta=true >>>> 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861) >>>> >>>> Alt B: >>>> With maint=0000001 and beta=false >>>> 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861M) >>>> >>>> Alt C: >>>> With maint=1000001 and beta=true >>>> 10.4.1.1 beta - (635861M) >>>> >>>> Alt D: >>>> With maint=1000001 and beta=false >>>> 10.4.1.1 - (635861M)
> Hi Dyre, > > This part of our release process seems to trip up every new release > manager and the instructions could use some improvement. My > understanding of bumplastdigit is this: you run it after you generate > a candidate and it sets up the release id for the next candidate. In > any event, with or without bumping the last digit, option (C) produces > a release id that looks good to me. OK, so your vote goes to C': With maint=1000000 and beta=true 10.4.1.0 beta - (635861M) ? -- dt
