> I agree that the arrangement of numbers (and the quantity ther of) does > not feel right. > > If there are any ideas about how to tackle this: send me real quick > scribbles of how this could work! > Here are the numbers I think need to be covered: > > 1. projected total monthly income > 2. currently participating snowdrifters > 3. your projected monthly cost > > Not sure about > 4. based on what snowdrift factor (e.g. 0.1¢) you pledge > >
I agree with the list above. But, as said in other reply, it's "patrons" not "snowdrifters" until we decide otherwise. I think if we include the per-patron pledge level in that view, it would be like this: "Your pledge: X per patron; currently Y patrons; your current donation level: Z" (thus it is obvious in this order that Z=X*Y) we could then say "…as part of total A that project receives monthly" In other words: PLEDGE-BASE * PATRONS = YOUR-PART of TOTAL That's a very clear logical way to structure these stats. -- Aaron Wolf Snowdrift.coop <https://snowdrift.coop> _______________________________________________ Design mailing list Design@lists.snowdrift.coop https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/design
