On lun, 2011-11-07 at 00:23 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Florian Müllner <fmuell...@gnome.org> > > To me it means that the application is in control of what > appears in the > jumplist, not necessarily that it is responsible for > specifying the > exact set of items. So I can imagine some "gnome-recent-items" > action > which is translated appropriately by the shell if included in > the .desktop file, but I would not expect anything in the > jumplist if > the application does not specify anything. > > > However if the app doesn't specify a list why not have a fallback > option. > Mostly you will end up using it in cases like gedit, rhythmbox, totem, > epiphany and event documents. In that case I suggest the usage of > zeitgeist and not gtk.recentmanager. Since such lists are dynamic i > don't find it appropriate to keep updating the .desktop file with > recently/most used every time the app is used. If apps really would do > that I would suggest them push directly into zeitgeist.
I did not suggest updating the .desktop file, I suggested "special" actions applications could specify to request certain content, for instance a list of recent items. (Obviously that would only be step three, after deciding whether the feature is wanted and implementing the basic functionality). Florian _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list