On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Florian Müllner <fmuell...@gnome.org> wrote:
> On lun, 2011-11-07 at 00:23 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Florian Müllner <fmuell...@gnome.org> > > > > To me it means that the application is in control of what > > appears in the > > jumplist, not necessarily that it is responsible for > > specifying the > > exact set of items. So I can imagine some "gnome-recent-items" > > action > > which is translated appropriately by the shell if included in > > the .desktop file, but I would not expect anything in the > > jumplist if > > the application does not specify anything. > > > > > > However if the app doesn't specify a list why not have a fallback > > option. > > Mostly you will end up using it in cases like gedit, rhythmbox, totem, > > epiphany and event documents. In that case I suggest the usage of > > zeitgeist and not gtk.recentmanager. Since such lists are dynamic i > > don't find it appropriate to keep updating the .desktop file with > > recently/most used every time the app is used. If apps really would do > > that I would suggest them push directly into zeitgeist. > > > I did not suggest updating the .desktop file, I suggested "special" > actions applications could specify to request certain content, for > instance a list of recent items. (Obviously that would only be step > three, after deciding whether the feature is wanted and implementing the > basic functionality). > > Fair enough :) > > Florian > >
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
