> Hello. Yes, i have read it (but not completely, to be honest... :-) > But either way - even if that library and the way it is implemented > on Linux is not good, for me, as a user, it provides a better solution, > as it allows me to do something without being forced to fiddle with > some config files. Again, from a *user* perspective, that simply is > better, i think. Cheers, alexander.
For you maybe, both for those of us end who expect to be able to have systems interoperate it is better to have no option for something like this that to have a feature that is inconsistent. There are different types of end users, and one size does not always fit all.
