Sorry if I said something related to 'politics'. It wasn't my intention. I'm looking to (Open)Solaris OS from different point of view than I'm looking to Linux distros.
Do you think that ARM port and others have been made to run as fast as they could? In other words, do you think that (Open)Solaris could run fast on that platforms. Linux is different architecture. Its disadvantages in other segments of the market where (Open)Solaris overwhelmingly rules here are advantages. It could be 'scaled down' to satisfy hardware requirements yet nobody demand 99.9% up-time. This is typical consumer electronics market. I think that you got what I wanted to say. Kind regards, Uros Nedic ---------------------------------------- > Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:01:53 +0100 > From: Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM > Subject: Re: [desktop-discuss] Moblin desktop UI on OpenSolaris > To: urosn at live.com > CC: desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org > > Uros Nedic wrote: >> Maybe we could make fork of it and call it MobOSOL. > > I'm not going to discuss any forks at this stage. Lets keep the politics > out of this an keep it technical and focused on seeing it if it > interesting to people and technical possible. > >> This way we could target Netbooks/Nettop machines. > > OpenSolaris already runs on that class of hardware. It even runs on ARM > processor based machines with very limited RAM now too. > >> Is this proper market of OSOL? > > Why not ? If it is "proper" for Linux why not for us too. If it is > technical possible why not make it work. > > -- > Darren J Moffat _________________________________________________________________ More than messages?check out the rest of the Windows Live?. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/
