Hi Sam/Gareth/Wilson, It is an initiative because it will span releases and is basically the UX manifestation of Ignite. The points about a separate IRC channel are valid. We didn't want to flood #fxos, but you're right, let's worry about that if it happens. Let's use #fxos (I updated the link).
I'll respond with more input on the other questions/points shortly. Peter On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Gareth Aye <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps Alopex is more of a release name than an initiative? > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Sam Foster <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think I have the same question as Karl. What you've described sounds >> like the vision for Firefox OS and the next logical iteration of what we've >> been doing. Any given release needs someone to lead it, but I'm not clear >> why we need new IRC channels and wiki pages? Isn't this just 2.6.. 3.0? >> >> /Sam >> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Karl Dubost <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> Le 29 sept. 2015 à 11:38, Peter Dolanjski <[email protected]> a >>> écrit : >>> > Firefox OS experience into "an open OS that puts Web content first". >>> >>> Would it be possible to have a concrete example of what you mean? Or >>> highlight the differences with the current Firefox OS? Or you could give me >>> a link with more details where it is already explained on how it would be >>> working? >>> >>> That would be cool. Thanks a lot. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Karl Dubost, Mozilla >>> http://www.la-grange.net/karl/moz >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-fxos mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-fxos mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> >> >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
