This was sent out by Ross Rader earlier this week to various persons,
including the lists (don't know if dev got it):
All,
Tucows has just entered its formal position concerning the arbitrary
limitation of registrant movement in the marketplace by a select few ICANN
accredited registrars. I'm sending this to you, as well as a number of
others under blind cover because you have expressed an interest in our
activities in this area (or related areas).
The document and cover letter can be found at the ICANN DNSO Registrars
Constituency mailing list archive at
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc01/msg00706.html
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at your
convenience.
Thanks,
Ross Wm. Rader
t. 416.538.5492
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles Daminato
TUCOWS Product Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, John M. Joy wrote:
> Charles Daminato wrote:
> >
> > This is a "Known Issue (tm)" (thank you Frank), and is something we're
> > working to resolve via ICANN, and hopefully with some *cough* cooperation
> > from NSI. If you have all the details of the following transaction
> > (NSI auth request, the response to them, and their subsequent denial) send
> > them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], were we are collecting information to
> > assist in our cause.
>
> Under the circumstances... why haven't any of the legal-types out
> there pounced on this as an opportunity for a class action? I'd
> have figured they'd be DROOLING (and, for once, would even welcome
> it)...
>
> JMJ
>
> --
> John M. Joy, Principal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Joy Associates http://joyassociates.com/associates/jmj.html
>
> Producer of the Electronic Valley - - Connecticut's Lower Naugatuck
> Valley region on-line: http://electronicvalley.org/
>
