Chuck, What would really be great is if we could do this without a limit: simply accept the requests and queue them for later processing.
Same for name server changes -- someone with a bunch of these doesn't care that much how long it takes as long as it happens soon. If I'm worried about a domain I can deal with that one domain. -- Lynn -----Original Message----- From: Charles Daminato [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:07 AM To: George Kirikos; Frank Michlick; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Domain Locking In Bulk This enhancement is already in the works (we're targetting 50/shot) and should be available in the next maintenance cycle (mid-late june) Charles Daminato OpenSRS Product Manager Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of George Kirikos > Sent: May 3, 2002 2:02 PM > To: Frank Michlick; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Domain Locking In Bulk > > > Hi Frank, > > --- Frank Michlick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Try this one - modify as you like. Please keep in mind it's just a > > quick hack > > and it's not supported. > > For those who use the RWI only, it would be cool if a similar > enhancement could be made. The simplest way would be to "clone" the > code used for the Renewal Management section. Instead of having 2 > columns, one would simply have a single column, with the "Set Auto > Renew" checkboxes column replaced with the Domain Lock status. The drop > down list box for the term would be removed, naturally. > > This way, we could do 40 locks/unlocks at a time. :) Also, one could > see at a glance which names are locked, and which are not. > > Sincerely, > > George Kirikos > http://www.kirikos.com/ > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness > http://health.yahoo.com
