Yeah, I understand that....

Maybe others will comment, but I think for the two narrow areas where I'd 
like this (name servers and now locking) we can live with that.

It is less of a problem for things like contact changes, because those 
basically happen instantly and we can say "change the technical contact for 
all domains in the profile" -- what we can't say is "change all nameservers 
for all domains in the profile" and I really want that.

-- Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From:   Charles Daminato [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, May 03, 2002 11:30 AM
To:     Lynn W. Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        RE: Domain Locking In Bulk

We could consider this.  Queuing requests opens a huge can of worms on
states and inconsistencies and reporting and error handling.  It's a lot
larger project (logistically, technically) than simply supplying a 
real-time
interface.

But I will take it under advisement :)

Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Product Manager
Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Lynn W. Taylor
> Sent: May 3, 2002 2:21 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Domain Locking In Bulk
>
>
> Chuck,
>
> What would really be great is if we could do this without a
> limit: simply accept the requests and queue them for later processing.
>
> Same for name server changes -- someone with a bunch of these
> doesn't care that much how long it takes as long as it happens soon.
>
> If I'm worried about a domain I can deal with that one domain.
>
> -- Lynn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Daminato [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:07 AM
> To:   George Kirikos; Frank Michlick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      RE: Domain Locking In Bulk
>
> This enhancement is already in the works (we're targetting 50/shot) and
> should be available in the next maintenance cycle (mid-late june)
>
> Charles Daminato
> OpenSRS Product Manager
> Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> > Behalf Of George Kirikos
> > Sent: May 3, 2002 2:02 PM
> > To: Frank Michlick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Domain Locking In Bulk
> >
> >
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> > --- Frank Michlick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Try this one - modify as you like. Please keep in mind it's just a
> > > quick hack
> > > and it's not supported.
> >
> > For those who use the RWI only, it would be cool if a similar
> > enhancement could be made. The simplest way would be to "clone" the
> > code used for the Renewal Management section. Instead of having 2
> > columns, one would simply have a single column, with the "Set Auto
> > Renew" checkboxes column replaced with the Domain Lock status. The drop
> > down list box for the term would be removed, naturally.
> >
> > This way, we could do 40 locks/unlocks at a time. :) Also, one could
> > see at a glance which names are locked, and which are not.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > George Kirikos
> > http://www.kirikos.com/
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
> > http://health.yahoo.com

Reply via email to