I will see - this time after the customer confirms our e-mail, I'm going to e-mail to whatever I have on list like [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc to see if there will be any difference.
The problem is almost all of the customers try to transfer their domain names some days before the expiration. So for NSI it is OK to "forget" to send an e-mail once, so the domain name expires in the meantime. No chance for second try. Isn't there a way to push them somehow - couldn't OpenSRS help us in such cases, calling them and saying "you bastards send the e-mail!". As I see there are many such cases.. Best regards, Doytchin Spiridonov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.WebYou.com Web Design and Development --- Wednesday, January 22, 2003, 11:52:17 PM, you wrote: R> We are also seeing this, I have two transfers pending right now, both R> customers have confirmed the TuCows request, however, they have not received R> any request from NSI. And NSI has been denying the transfer after about a R> week. Each domain is now on it's second or third request and still no R> response from NSI. Any recourse? R> Robert. R> ----- Original Message ----- R> From: "Doytchin Spiridonov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:31 PM R> Subject: Re[2]: Transfer Email >> Then NetworkSolutions should be banned? Do you think this could happen >> some day? :) >> >> I just had a problem with a transfer - a client tried to transfer a >> domain from NetworkSolutions for 4th time with the same result - he >> confirms the e-mail from our system, then after a week he gets an >> e-mail from NSI that the transfer is canceled because he didn't >> confirmed their e-mail confirmation. But the client claims he never >> receives an e-mail confirmation from them just the info e-mail that >> the transfer is canceled. Blah, what to do in such a case? >> >> Best regards, >> Doytchin Spiridonov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.WebYou.com Web Design and Development >> >> >> --- >> Wednesday, January 22, 2003, 10:45:54 PM, you wrote: >> >> >> i> Let me say this differently, IMHO: >> >> i> 1) Renewal stealing requires a procedural solution. Read: >> i> You loose your ICANN status if you do not "play nice" with >> i> the other registrars. >> >> i> 2) Spammers can/must be handled with a tech solution -- >> i> After all they never signed a contract. (LOL!) For example >> i> my IP idea described below. >> >> >> i> --- The Forwarded Message Follows --- >> >>
