On 16/04/15 02:13, Karl Dubost wrote: > Definitely. The resistance in this thread is NOT about "people > against security", but 1. we want to be able to choose 2. if we > choose safe, we want that choice to be easy to activate.
I'd have it the other way. If you even assume choice should be possible then: 1) We want to be able to choose 2) If we choose unsafe, we want that choice to be relatively hard to activate. In other words, "safe" should be the default. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
