On 01/03/2019 10:07 AM, Justin Wood wrote:
on the specific proposal front I can envision us allowing tests to be run on non-pgo builds via triggers (so never by default, but always backfillable/selectable) should someone need to try and bisect an issue that is discovered... I'm not sure if the code maintenance burden is worth it for the benefit but I don't hold a strong opinion there.
Is it a lot of maintenance? We have this for some other jobs (linux64-shell-haz is the one I'm most familiar with, but it's a standalone job so doesn't have non-toolchain graph dependencies). I get quite a bit of value out of the resulting faster hack-try-debug cycles; I would imagine it to be at least as useful to have a turnaround time of 1 hour for opt vs 2 hours for pgo.
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
