On 28/05/15 23:07, Richard Barnes wrote: > I agree that if CNNIC is to reapply, it should be with a new root. It > creates a clean break between the past and the future. It clarifies that > the new audits that are required apply to the new thing, and that the old > thing is dead. It's marginally easier to implement.
Note my post up-thread; in saying this, are you aware of the significantly greater level of sanction that this request imposes as a side-effect? Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
