On 09/05/2016 10:54 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
Hi Eddy,
On 04/09/16 09:51, Eddy Nigg wrote:
I don't want to extend this discussion unnecessarily, but as a side note
you don't know which agreements this employee has signed with StartCom
and/or WoSign and hence you can't make a judgement on it either. Lets
leave this to the professionals dealing with it.
If he has signed an agreement with StartCom and/or WoSign which prevents
him from pointing out, after leaving employment, facts which are in the
public domain, then I suggest that those clauses in the agreement are an
unconscionable[0] restriction on his freedoms and you should not be
enforcing them.
Again, I don't think we can and will solve this in public, however I
believe it's the complete right of a company (and employer) to decide
how and when it wants to make an official public announcement about its
business (and being just in order to complete a currently ongoing
transaction first).
Not every employee is authorized to represent the company and inform
third parties (at his/her convenient timing and consideration) even if
he/she knows about it and/or some information has been placed into
(partly) public domain as part of a business process.
I hope my explanation makes it clear that this ex-employee was not
authorized to provide any information about StartCom or WoSign.
--
Regards
Signer: Eddy Nigg, Founder
StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
XMPP: start...@startcom.org <xmpp:start...@startcom.org>
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
