-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 05/17/2017 05:04 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> If the key is compromised, you can't rely on any date information 
> anymore, you need to revoke it completely and break things.
> 

Won't that only be true in certificates without SCTs? Once you have a
SCT, you have an independent timestamp you can check beside the
NotBefore value, and can independently confirm since CT logs are
append-only.

(Granted, I realize nothing actually checks the SCT in this way to my
knowledge, but the idea itself may be on semi-solid ground).
Michael

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=RWD4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to