On 05/10/17 20:00, Inigo Barreira wrote:
> Has this been asked ever? Has any other CA published it? It´s just to know. 
> And, is there a "default" scope for this kind of security audits?

Well, you indicated your willingness to publish them in an email to me,
if I remember correctly. And it would allow others to assess your claim
that the code is not bad, and is secure.

Gerv

_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
      • Re: PROCERT issue... Kathleen Wilson via dev-security-policy
        • Re: PROCERT i... Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy
        • Re: PROCERT i... Kathleen Wilson via dev-security-policy
          • Re: PROCE... Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy
          • Re: PROCE... Kathleen Wilson via dev-security-policy
          • Re: PROCE... Gervase Markham via dev-security-policy
            • Re: ... Matt Palmer via dev-security-policy
            • RE: ... Inigo Barreira via dev-security-policy
            • Re: ... Gervase Markham via dev-security-policy
              • ... Inigo Barreira via dev-security-policy
              • ... Gervase Markham via dev-security-policy
              • ... okaphone.elektronika--- via dev-security-policy
            • Re: ... westmail24--- via dev-security-policy
            • Re: ... Kathleen Wilson via dev-security-policy
            • Re: ... James Burton via dev-security-policy
            • Re: ... James Burton via dev-security-policy
  • Re: PROCERT issues alejandrovolcan--- via dev-security-policy
  • Re: PROCERT issues alejandrovolcan--- via dev-security-policy

Reply via email to