On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:18 AM nadim--- via dev-security-policy < dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> I think we're all choosing to kid ourselves here if we continue to say > that the underlying impetus for this discussion isn't primarily > sociopolitical. The sooner an end is put to this, the better. > I don't think it's productive nor charitable to suggest that the participants are behaving disingenuously, especially when it's been repeatedly highlighted that the concerns are not and have not been sociopolitical in nature. This seems unnecessarily dismissive of the discussion to date, and likely prevents productive discourse. > by either Mozilla, the CABForum, or both > I just want to highlight that the CA/Browser Forum has absolutely no relevance to this discussion or matter, nor has it ever. The CA/Browser Forum is merely a discussion forum for examining common baseline technical requirements. It is not, nor has it ever, been an appropriate place to discuss the inclusion, exclusion, or trustworthiness of given entities, and has zero bearing whatsoever in the security and policy decisions application software vendors may produce. _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
