On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:52 PM Ryan Sleevi <r...@sleevi.com> wrote: I appreciate the attention to detail, but I find it difficult to feel that > it is a good faith effort that is designed to produce results consistent > with the goals that many of this community have and share, and thus don't > think it would be a particularly valuable thing to continue discussing. > While there is certainly novelty in the approach, which is not at all > unfamiliar in the legal profession [3], care should be taken to make sure > that we are making forward progress, rather than beating dead horses. >
In the spirit of demonstrating good faith, looking forward, and perhaps even making a useful contribution), I have started a new thread [1] in which I propose alternative language which might replace the specification presently in BR 7.1. I would appreciate your thoughts on it. [1] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/PDzNNsxhzLU/F0uxY6qmCAAJ > _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
