On 10.02.2009 02:23, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
I'd post this in the policy working group, if that was operational ... :(
In<f790af94-3997-43b6-a5aa-a4d79119c...@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
our esteemed Kathleen Wilson<kathleen95...@yahoo.com> wrote:
According to https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:How_to_apply
“If there are no open issues or action items after the first
discussion period, and there is general agreement that you comply with
our policy requirements, then at the Foundation's discretion the
second phase of public discussion may be skipped, the request will be
immediately approved, and the request will move into the inclusion
phase…”
I wonder if it is right for us to allow CA
applications to be approved in the absence of any real public discussion.
In the complete absence of any discussion, positive or negative, does it
seem right to allow CAs to go into the list by default?
How do you arrive at "complete absense of any discussion" from the "If
there are no open issues or action items after the first discussion
period" and the "general agreement"?
There *was* a discussion period, and in fact there had to be responses,
otherwise there couldn't be "general agreement". It's just that nobody
had any problems with it, after the discussion (or right away). Why
wouldn't you include the CA, then?
Are you fearing that you are on holiday during that time and can't have
your voice?
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
