On Jun 19, 3:41 am, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that the collision of "Camino is a mozilla.org project" and > "Camino is its own project" is what has led to this debate. Exactly > where the UA string falls in that is the question at hand.
Once again, I would like an explanation of why there is a question. It's a change within the Camino portion of the tree, it has absolutely no direct effect on any other product or shared component, it violates no web standards, and we have been told there are no legal issues. It's fantastic that this has sparked discussion of having real weight put behind the evangelism effort, and we (the Camino team) will certainly watch where this discussion goes and adjust our plans accordingly--as Sam said, all of us would rather see the need for this kind of hack to go away, rather than using the hack--but these repeated vague claims that somehow the standard module ownership system does not apply here, without any explanation of why (and again, why is this in m.d.t.layout?) are really frustrating. If you'd like to discuss this offline that's fine, but unless someone can give a substantive argument it would be very helpful if this discussion could stop being framed in terms of the community's right to dictate Camino policy to the Camino developers and owners. _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
