Hadrian awesome job and you rock. I will report this at the board meeting in Feb.
Thanks dudes Cheers, Chris ------------------------ Chris Mattmann chris.mattm...@gmail.com -----Original Message----- From: Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> Reply-To: <dev@activemq.apache.org> Date: Friday, January 17, 2014 10:09 AM To: <dev@activemq.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Remove the old ActiveMQ Console >Chris, agree. Yesterday I committed Dan Kulp's patch that reverts back >to the original ActiveMQ console. At this point, the hawt.io console is >not in the trunk and won't be in the next release in this shape. The >only release that shipped with the hawt.io console is 5.9.0, but that's >not much we can do about that. I volunteered to release shortly a 5.9.1 >version (with the original console). Hopefully a final decision about >the future of the ActiveMQ console will be reached before the next board >meeting, as you recommend. > >Thanks, >Hadrian > > > >On 01/17/2014 12:20 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I reported at the board meeting two days ago that you guys >> are making steps towards addressing this. The big issue that >> still remains is that hawtio in its current form unbranded >> as the default Apache ActiveMQ console must be fixed ASAP and >> addressed. *How* that is done is currently being discussed, but >> realize that discussion needs to conclude in a reasonable time >> frame, let's say before the next board meeting 3rd week of February >>2014. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robert Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> >> Reply-To: <dev@activemq.apache.org> >> Date: Friday, January 17, 2014 1:32 AM >> To: <dev@activemq.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Remove the old ActiveMQ Console >> >>> This discussion has been open a while - not exactly consensus but then >>> there¹s not really much difference either. There does seem to be >>>general >>> consensus amongst the poor folks who actually maintain the old console >>> (me included) it should die quickly, but I think we should keep it >>>around >>> optionally for those users who can¹t use anything else?. >>> We have to get this resolved quickly - so I¹ll start a vote and hope to >>> gain some consensus, at least within the PMC. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> Rob >>> On 16 Jan 2014, at 22:21, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I think the web-console should die, letting it rot in a subproject >>>> will not make it more secure,usable nor maintainable. >>>> >>>> Then we either - >>>> 1) skin hawtio with an Apache ActiveMQ brand and continue to ship it >>>> 2) document the extension points for third party consoles. >>>> >>>> I think dropping needs to be contingent on either 1 or 2. >>>> >>>> Imho, hawtio does it right with the jolokia jmx/http bridge and has >>>> some nice extension points so I am in favour of 1 >>>> >>>> On 2 January 2014 09:59, Robert Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> The old/original console is no longer fit for purpose, it is hard to >>>>> maintain, the source of a lot of security issues [1] over the last >>>>>few >>>>> years. >>>>> >>>>> There is another thread about using hawtio as the console going >>>>> forward, and without going into all the gory details it is probably >>>>> likely that there may be no web console shipped at all in future >>>>> releases of ActiveMQ. The JMX naming hierarchy was improved for >>>>> ActiveMQ 5.8, such that its easy to view the running status of an >>>>> ActiveMQ broker from 3rd party tools such as jconsole, visualvm or >>>>> hawtio. Regardless of the outcome of the other discussion [2] - It >>>>> doesn¹t help the ActiveMQ project to try and maintain a static web >>>>> console any more. >>>>> >>>>> I propose we remove the old web console from the ActiveMQ 5.10 >>>>>release >>>>> - thoughts ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> >>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2714?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQ >>>>>%2 >>>>> 0AND%20text%20~%20%22XSS%22 >>>>> [2] >>>>> >>>>>http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Default-Web-Console-td4675705.ht >>>>>ml >>>>> >>>>> Rob Davies >>>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹ >>>>> Red Hat, Inc >>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha >>>>> Twitter: rajdavies >>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com >>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://redhat.com >>>> http://blog.garytully.com >>> >>> Rob Davies >>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹ >>> Red Hat, Inc >>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha >>> Twitter: rajdavies >>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>> >> >>
