hi Chris,

The HornetQ code has been donated to the ActiveMQ project, and that code is going through its first release under the ASF. The vote [1] - sparked some debate - which was is why this thread started - my fault I should have been clearer.

[1] http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-6-0-0-td4692911.html

Chris Mattmann <mailto:[email protected]>
25 March 2015 14:07
Can someone please explain what is being discussed?
I’m sorry I don’t follow the subtleties here.

Is there a code donation being proposed to Apache

ActiveMQ?

Cheers,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Davies <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 1:47 AM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation



Rob Davies <mailto:[email protected]>
25 March 2015 08:47
(was: HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation)

Thanks Lionel - I agree.

The [VOTE] thread was getting a little verbose, and a little heated. There were a lot of opinions, and a lot of assumptions and its likely there was some miscommunication when HornetQ was donated to the ActiveMQ community. On the plus side, its great that there are so many passionate members of the community.

It seems there is no consensus from the ActiveMQ community that HornetQ should be the next generation of ActiveMQ - yet - and hence should be a sub-project with its own name. Personally, I believe there are a lot of advantages of starting development of ActiveMQ 6 around a HornetQ core - but as Hadrian as already pointed out - it does need to validate itself by growing its own diverse community first. I hope the ActiveMQ community as a whole gets involved in the code donated from HornetQ and pushes it the right way.

Rob

Reply via email to