Thanks for the explanation, Rob. Got it. I have replied else-thread on this.
Cheers, Chris -----Original Message----- From: Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> Reply-To: <dev@activemq.apache.org> Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 4:42 AM To: <dev@activemq.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation > >hi Chris, > >The HornetQ code has been donated to the ActiveMQ project, and that code > is going through its first release under the ASF. The vote [1] - >sparked some debate - which was is why this thread started - my fault I >should have been clearer. > >[1] >http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-6-0-0-td4692911 >.html > > > > > Chris Mattmann <mailto:mattm...@apache.org> > > 25 March 2015 >14:07 > > > Can someone please explain > what is being discussed? >I’m sorry I don’t follow the subtleties >here. > >Is there a code donation being proposed to Apache > >ActiveMQ? > >Cheers, >Chris > >-----Original > Message----- >From: Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> <mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com> >Reply-To: > <dev@activemq.apache.org> <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org> >Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at >1:47 AM >To: <dev@activemq.apache.org> <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org> >Subject: [DISCUSS} >HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation > > > > > > > > > Rob Davies <mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com> > > 25 March 2015 >08:47 > > > >(was: HornetQ & >ActiveMQ's next generation) > >Thanks Lionel - I agree. > >The [VOTE] thread was getting a little verbose, and a little heated. >There were a lot of opinions, and a lot of assumptions and its likely >there was some miscommunication when HornetQ was donated to the ActiveMQ > community. >On the plus side, its great that there are so many passionate members of > the community. > >It seems there is no consensus from the ActiveMQ community that HornetQ >should be the next generation of ActiveMQ - yet - and hence should be a >sub-project with its own name. >Personally, I believe there are a lot of advantages of starting >development of ActiveMQ 6 around a HornetQ core - but as Hadrian as >already pointed out - it does need to validate itself by growing its own > diverse community first. I hope the ActiveMQ community as a whole gets >involved in the code donated from HornetQ and pushes it the right way. > >Rob > > > >
