Sorry, can't stop typing. 

My impression is the problem hornetQ is a solution for is that anyone picking a 
messaging solution based on technical rather than political factors is not 
going to pick activemq.  I thought Hiram said this pretty explicitly.  Did I 
misunderstand?

thanks
david jencks

On Mar 25, 2015, at 12:05 PM, artnaseef <a...@artnaseef.com> wrote:

> Growing the community around HornetQ is the same issue regardless of the
> naming - it needs to happen, and just naming it ActiveMQ 6 doesn't really
> change anything other than to create the presumption that HornetQ will
> succeed as ActiveMQ 6.
> 
> Sharing a direction across the community is important, and making sure that
> direction is clear is also important.  In that light, I am very glad to be
> having this discussion.
> 
> The statement "Neglecting to commit to a direction will leave ActiveMQ
> rudderless" is valid, but does not decide that direction.  Nor does it mean
> that a complete restart of ActiveMQ is the right direction.
> 
> So, let's put this back into perspective.
> 
> We have the HornetQ donation to ActiveMQ.  To what benefit for the ActiveMQ
> community?  Age of the solution is not a compelling argument (consider that
> Java is even older than ActiveMQ).
> 
> ActiveMQ continues to be very widely used and supported.  It serves
> mission-critical functions in large companies across multiple industries,
> and even supports critical government infrastructure in many places.
> 
> Only time will tell if HornetQ is up to the task on all fronts: strength of
> technology; community to maintain, support, and advocate the technology;
> ease of installation, use, and monitoring; etc.  Therefore, a presumption
> that it will replace an existing, proven solution is premature.
> 
> Really, the merits here are hard to argue because I'm not seeing any valid
> merits described.
> 
> I keep wondering, "what problem are we solving?"  Please help me to
> understand this and how the HornetQ donation solves the problem.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-HornetQ-ActiveMQ-s-next-generation-tp4693781p4693805.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to