> > > By the way, if we're talking benchmarks, here's a benchmark that shows > ActiveMQ outperforming HornetQ: > http://blog.x-aeon.com/2013/04/10/a-quick-message-queue-benchmark-activemq-rabbitmq-hornetq-qpid-apollo/
That is stomp. We had a few issues with stomp on 2.3.0. That has nothing to do with the architecture of hornetq. It only tells that stomp is not optimized on the code base. If that was a blocker for you I could run the benchmark and optimize any issues next week.
