> On Mar 25, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Christopher Shannon > <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com <mailto:christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > As Andy pointed out, having everyone in > the community join together to support one broker going forward would > produce a better broker than by splitting up resources and potentially > causing it to die out.
I think everyone (mostly) agrees with that. So the next step is getting consensus with the community on what that one broker going forward looks like. Picking one then expecting the community to follow seems a bit backwards.
