Hello guys, I totally agree with last 2 David posts. I'm responsible for the messaging and transactions platform/infrastructure in Movile.com.
For the last 9 years we tried almost all brokers possibilities, ibm, hornetq, amq, openmq, rabbitmq, sqs, etc, etc. And all kind of integrations/structures/languages/protocols/etc. We are running about 150 billion msgs/year, almost 100% in hornetq(70%) and websphere mq(25%). And these middlewares were chosen for really good technical reasons. My opinion: hornetq core + improvements(already done in this "amq rc") + compatibility with amq5. It's awesome, can't be better. What doubts do you still have about this? I agree that Amq5 and its community have merits, but it needs a new core, and I can't see better opportunity. Is it reasonable to have 2 apache brokers? Performance/Integrity/Stability/Compatibility Regards, Daniel La Laina sent from s4 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-HornetQ-ActiveMQ-s-next-generation-tp4693781p4693862.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
