Actually the most important thing for me is to keep hornetq core alive, because it's really good.
The (re)name is more a brand thing, amq6, hornetq3, newname1. My point about using amq name, was more like: "why to create a new amq core, if there is the possibility to use hornetq core, which is good" But a rebrand of hornetq (as hornetq or <newname>) as a new apache broker is awesome too. And communities contributors can migrate or help each other. Regards, Daniel La Laina sent from s4 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-HornetQ-ActiveMQ-s-next-generation-tp4693781p4693867.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
