Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2191#discussion_r204860714 --- Diff: artemis-core-client/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/core/impl/wireformat/SessionQueueQueryResponseMessage_V4.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ +package org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.core.impl.wireformat; + +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.ActiveMQBuffer; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.RoutingType; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.SimpleString; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.client.ActiveMQClient; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.client.ClientSession; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.QueueQueryImpl; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.QueueQueryResult; + +public class SessionQueueQueryResponseMessage_V4 extends SessionQueueQueryResponseMessage_V3 { + + protected int defaultConsumerWindowSize; + + public SessionQueueQueryResponseMessage_V4(final QueueQueryResult result) { + this(result.getName(), result.getAddress(), result.isDurable(), result.isTemporary(), result.getFilterString(), result.getConsumerCount(), result.getMessageCount(), result.isExists(), result.isAutoCreateQueues(), result.isAutoCreated(), result.isPurgeOnNoConsumers(), result.getRoutingType(), result.getMaxConsumers(), result.isExclusive(), result.isLastValue(), result.getDefaultConsumerWindowSize()); --- End diff -- @cshannon just wondering.. wouldn't be worth to invest here to return a hashMap instead? We keep creating V4, V5... if we start using a Map, we wouldn't need to change the wire for this ever again.
---