Can you post a link for the implementation you made? On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 4:24 PM Ragnar Paulson <ragnarpaul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've been haphazardly following this discussion. I did some work on the > NMS API last year, possibly the 20-odd commits you refer to. > > It is correct to say that NMS is just a general open interface to any > transport, openwire is just one. The work I did was for AMQP. I've > forgotten how many transports are implemented in the NMS project but I > believe it was somewhere between 3 and 6 (STOMP is there as well). > > Also the measure of the importance of the API should be in the > downloads/use of the API, not in the code modifications. But on the other > hand, if there are no tickets or bugs being raised it's probable it's not > being used. > > The work I did to create an AMQP transport for Apache.NMS was for > AMQPnetLite, not for QPID AMQP. The main thing it lacks is nuget > packaging to be generally available in the .NET world. > > That said, I have found my priorities have changed and I'm not the person > to be the champion here, so I can't argue strongly for maintaining a > development tree that I won't likely contribute to very much. It would be > nice to see it carried on, but if the community as a whole does not see any > use for this then better to let it atrophy. > > Regards, > Ragnar > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:58 PM <michael.andre.pea...@me.com.invalid> wrote: > > > I think he was wanting to make a new one that wrapping latest qpid, which > > would be awesome. > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:48 PM +0000, <michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So there is already an amqp nms implementation > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:08 PM +0000, "Clebert Suconic" < > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There was a guy at some point trying to implement AMQP on NMS. what > > happened to that front? any knows about it? > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:04 PM wrote: > > > > > > So the point of these is they provide a clean api regardless of > > underlying protocol. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Its not based on openwire so i disagree on your point there, it is > > providing a higher level api abstraction. Which open wire is just one of > > many protocols implementing the api. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > E.g. amqp switch over from open wire here are clear points for a > > developer to switch from one to the other, as there is an implementation > > for both against nms, its very easy to switch over. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
-- Clebert Suconic
