As you may have noticed in another thread on the dev list, I've been looking at updating the website. When I was browsing through all the content from NMS & CMS I was surprised to see how much of it was stale - especially the NMS content. There were references to multiple providers that had never been released and several that hadn't been released since 2009 (almost 10 years ago now). I then went and looked at the contributor reports on GitHub for the various repositories and noticed low participation. All this indicated to me that perhaps it would be worth discussing the status of these projects. Subsequently I checked out the participation on the relevant Stack Overflow tags and noticed that was low as well.
One of the goals of the website overhaul is to make things more clear for users so I thought it might make sense to update the NMS & CMS pages to reflect the apparent lack of commitment from the community. This thread has been open for 10 days now and as of yet nobody has stepped forward and identified themselves as being committed to these repositories. I just want the website to be clear to users can make informed decisions about what software they choose. As others have mentioned in various threads the amount of stale content across the website (not just on the NMS & CMS pages) is fairly concerning. I imagine this has hurt the project the last few years as maintenance has fallen off, and I'm keen to improve the situation. Justin On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:21 PM jgenender <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote: > I’m interested where this is coming from. There was a fairly big thread > recently with regard to CPP and patching of which Jamie Goodyear attempted > to put in some patches and was subsequently slapped by Tim Bish. In > addition it appeared that Tim Bish recently released a CPP with a change. > It seems to me there is certainly devs who are contributing. > > Is there a reason that you feel there is nobody supporting it? Remember > this is based on client code to AMQ which is largely something that doesn’t > change often except for bugs. > > I’m interested in your thoughts here. > > Jeff > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html >
