I think the use of nms api is a little more active than you believe.
Then the open wire one has a download on nuget of the last release alone 167k times according to stats here https://packages.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ/ Like wise theres a quite active netstd (not apache) that uses nms api, last release 7 months ago. https://packages.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ.NetStd/ Get Outlook for Android On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:46 AM +0000, "Justin Bertram" <jbert...@apache.org> wrote: Thanks for clarifying the condition of your NMS AMQP provider contribution. To be clear, the NMS website [1] lists 8 providers: - *ActiveMQ* - last release in 2016; https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-openwire - *STOMP* - last release in 2013; https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-stomp - *MSMQ* - last (and only) release in 2009; https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-msmq - *EMS* - last (and only) release in 2009; https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-ems - *WCF* - last (and only) release in 2009; can't find any repo - *AMQP* - never released; https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp - *MQTT* - never released; can't find any repo - *XMS* - never released; https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-xms Then there's a repository at https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-zmq for a ZeroMQ provider that isn't listed on the website at all with no apparent releases. Justin [1] http://activemq.apache.org/nms On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:24 PM Ragnar Paulson wrote: > I've been haphazardly following this discussion. I did some work on the > NMS API last year, possibly the 20-odd commits you refer to. > > It is correct to say that NMS is just a general open interface to any > transport, openwire is just one. The work I did was for AMQP. I've > forgotten how many transports are implemented in the NMS project but I > believe it was somewhere between 3 and 6 (STOMP is there as well). > > Also the measure of the importance of the API should be in the > downloads/use of the API, not in the code modifications. But on the other > hand, if there are no tickets or bugs being raised it's probable it's not > being used. > > The work I did to create an AMQP transport for Apache.NMS was for > AMQPnetLite, not for QPID AMQP. The main thing it lacks is nuget > packaging to be generally available in the .NET world. > > That said, I have found my priorities have changed and I'm not the person > to be the champion here, so I can't argue strongly for maintaining a > development tree that I won't likely contribute to very much. It would be > nice to see it carried on, but if the community as a whole does not see any > use for this then better to let it atrophy. > > Regards, > Ragnar > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:58 PM > wrote: > > > I think he was wanting to make a new one that wrapping latest qpid, > which > > would be awesome. > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:48 PM +0000, > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So there is already an amqp nms implementation > > > > > > > > > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:08 PM +0000, "Clebert Suconic" < > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There was a guy at some point trying to implement AMQP on NMS. what > > happened to that front? any knows about it? > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:04 PM wrote: > > > > > > So the point of these is they provide a clean api regardless of > > underlying protocol. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Its not based on openwire so i disagree on your point there, it is > > providing a higher level api abstraction. Which open wire is just one of > > many protocols implementing the api. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > E.g. amqp switch over from open wire here are clear points for a > > developer to switch from one to the other, as there is an implementation > > for both against nms, its very easy to switch over. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
