On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:05:22 -0500, you wrote: | Im in favor of updated the CMS to a more current C++, given the | sustained interest in C++ and ActiveMQ.
In-project interest seems to have shifted to Artemis (and AMQP), making Classic a step-child within its own project. | Generally, forking isnt great for anyone in the long term. I agree. But what choices remain when "Won't fix" wihout explanation is the gatekeepers' response to an obvious improvement? | Perhaps its best suited for a v4.x release and baseline against | newer C++ libs? This sounds like a good idea. What is the procedure for this?
