I'm not suggesting we remove it.. just if there is value in bringing it to artemis.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 10:24 AM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The REST service in ActiveMQ 5 is actively used, and should not be removed. > If there are bugs or issues, please file a JIRA. > > Thanks, > Matt Pavlovich > > > On Sep 12, 2022, at 3:58 PM, Tetreault, Lucas <tetlu...@amazon.com.INVALID> > > wrote: > > > > Should we remove REST from ActiveMQ "Classic" as well? I think the same > > arguments apply about it being abandonware, etc. > > > > We could deprecate it in the upcoming 5.18.0 release and use this as > > incentive to cut a 6.0.0 release? __ That would be exciting! > > > > - Lucas > > > > On 2022-09-12, 7:41 AM, "Clebert Suconic" <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > > the content is safe. > > > > > > > > I will go ahead and remove it... > > > > > > I will also bump upstream/main as 3.0 as part of the removal. > > > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:24 PM Clebert Suconic > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I didn’t meant to imply I was going to remove it now > >> > >> I intend to do it on Monday. If no objection. > >> > >> > >> Although keeping it means we would have to fix it. I honestly don’t see > >> many options to keep it. > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 1:09 PM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> While I'm fine with it going I'd maybe give other folks more of chance > >>> to reply...or at least use lay concensus style 'ill do it at <date> if > >>> noone objects' :) > >>> > >>> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 17:48, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I will go ahead and remove it... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> to be honest I don't believe much in rest from JMS due to the session > >>>> and stateful nature. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> But if we were to provide REST for our users, I would rather bring the > >>>> servlet from AMQ5. it would be a major task anyway... and this > >>>> module has to go for sure. > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 10:20 AM Robbie Gemmell > >>>> <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> It has looked to be rotting for a long time, and requires various user > >>>>> hoop jumping I dont expect many/any folks are interested in doing....I > >>>>> think removing it makes sense. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 14:54, Clebert Suconic > >>>>> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm not sure if there's much to discuss here. Rest in Artemis has been > >>>>>> abandonware for a while (like 5 years)... The jboss-rest interface is > >>>>>> a few major releases behind, the module compiles but it's not > >>>>>> functional, and any time someone ask questions we just mention don't > >>>>>> use it... (favoring stomp instead). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/tree/main/artemis-rest > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As part of new logging changes, we are moving activemq-artemis into > >>>>>> 3.0... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> At this point I see no other choice than remove the module. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Any objections? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Clebert Suconic > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Clebert Suconic > >> > >> -- > >> Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > -- Clebert Suconic
