>>  Although I don't
think anybody wants to invest the resources to bring all the dependencies
up-to-date. <<


until someone does that, I think it should be out.


this is pretty much abandonware.

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:04 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I've been meaning to get to this for awhile. Better late than never, right?
>
> Generally speaking, I agree that REST is not a great fit for messaging.
> Whenever folks ask about it on the mailing lists, Slack, Stack Overflow,
> etc. I strongly encourage them for two main reasons:
>
>  - The STOMP protocol is ubiquitous, simple, standardized, and can be used
> in almost every circumstance and environment where REST might be used.
>  - REST is not portable because there's no standard messaging interface for
> REST. This is generally bad for users as it locks them in to a specific
> broker.
>
> Here are a few additional reasons:
>
>  - For simple use-cases (e.g. basic send & receive) it's easy these days to
> create your own REST interface and then implement messaging behind that.
> Since the REST interface is in the user's control portability isn't an
> issue.
>  - It's a bit of a pain to setup as it requires manually building a WAR
> file.
>
> That said, it **is functional**. All the REST tests in the test-suite are
> passing, and I just ran through the documentation and tested it on a fresh
> install of 2.25.0. Everything works as far as I can tell. Although I don't
> think anybody wants to invest the resources to bring all the dependencies
> up-to-date.
>
> Also, I think we should deprecate it and update the documentation with an
> explanation before we completely remove it.
>
>
> Justin
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:04 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if there's much to discuss here. Rest in Artemis has been
> > abandonware for a while (like 5 years)... The jboss-rest interface is
> > a few major releases behind, the module compiles but it's not
> > functional, and any time someone ask questions we just mention don't
> > use it... (favoring stomp instead).
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/tree/main/artemis-rest
> >
> >
> > As part of new logging changes, we are moving activemq-artemis into 3.0...
> >
> > At this point I see no other choice than remove the module.
> >
> > Any objections?
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> >
> >



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to