Hey Clebert- Yeah, I was just addressing Lucas’ question from earlier in the thread re removing from ActiveMQ 5.
-Matt > On Sep 13, 2022, at 9:27 AM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'm not suggesting we remove it.. just if there is value in bringing > it to artemis. > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 10:24 AM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The REST service in ActiveMQ 5 is actively used, and should not be removed. >> If there are bugs or issues, please file a JIRA. >> >> Thanks, >> Matt Pavlovich >> >>> On Sep 12, 2022, at 3:58 PM, Tetreault, Lucas <tetlu...@amazon.com.INVALID> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Should we remove REST from ActiveMQ "Classic" as well? I think the same >>> arguments apply about it being abandonware, etc. >>> >>> We could deprecate it in the upcoming 5.18.0 release and use this as >>> incentive to cut a 6.0.0 release? __ That would be exciting! >>> >>> - Lucas >>> >>> On 2022-09-12, 7:41 AM, "Clebert Suconic" <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not >>> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know >>> the content is safe. >>> >>> >>> >>> I will go ahead and remove it... >>> >>> >>> I will also bump upstream/main as 3.0 as part of the removal. >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:24 PM Clebert Suconic >>> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I didn’t meant to imply I was going to remove it now >>>> >>>> I intend to do it on Monday. If no objection. >>>> >>>> >>>> Although keeping it means we would have to fix it. I honestly don’t see >>>> many options to keep it. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 1:09 PM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> While I'm fine with it going I'd maybe give other folks more of chance >>>>> to reply...or at least use lay concensus style 'ill do it at <date> if >>>>> noone objects' :) >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 17:48, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I will go ahead and remove it... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> to be honest I don't believe much in rest from JMS due to the session >>>>>> and stateful nature. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But if we were to provide REST for our users, I would rather bring the >>>>>> servlet from AMQ5. it would be a major task anyway... and this >>>>>> module has to go for sure. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 10:20 AM Robbie Gemmell >>>>>> <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It has looked to be rotting for a long time, and requires various user >>>>>>> hoop jumping I dont expect many/any folks are interested in doing....I >>>>>>> think removing it makes sense. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 14:54, Clebert Suconic >>>>>>> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm not sure if there's much to discuss here. Rest in Artemis has been >>>>>>>> abandonware for a while (like 5 years)... The jboss-rest interface is >>>>>>>> a few major releases behind, the module compiles but it's not >>>>>>>> functional, and any time someone ask questions we just mention don't >>>>>>>> use it... (favoring stomp instead). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/tree/main/artemis-rest >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As part of new logging changes, we are moving activemq-artemis into >>>>>>>> 3.0... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At this point I see no other choice than remove the module. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any objections? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Clebert Suconic >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Clebert Suconic >>> >> > > > -- > Clebert Suconic
