I need your help -- this month's board report must be submitted tomorrow
and there have been zero contributions. I need some folks to input to form
this report in the next 24 hours by adding your contributions the following
file in git:

https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/main/src/team/reports/DRAFT-ActiveMQ-board-report.txt

We already missed last month's report submission due to a late sending of
the notice email. Please don't make us wait another month.

Bruce

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 10:10 AM Bruce Snyder <[email protected]> wrote:

> REMINDER: We now have 7 days to submit the ASF Board Report.
>
> Please provide your contributions for this report via the following file
> in the git repo:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/main/src/team/reports/DRAFT-ActiveMQ-board-report.txt
>
>
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:30 PM Bruce Snyder <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> And today the notification for the February board report just came out. I
>> will submit the report by Feb 7.
>>
>> Please provide your contributions for the board report by adding them to
>> the following file using git:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/main/src/team/reports/DRAFT-ActiveMQ-board-report.txt
>>
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:02 AM Bruce Snyder <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, then let's use this file to gather contributions for next month's
>>> ActiveMQ board report.
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:13 AM Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yep, that is exactly what the file was added for and used to prepare
>>>> the previous board report draft, following previous discussions about
>>>> doing so. Its the one I was enquiring whether to delete or not earlier
>>>> in the thread.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 18:26, Bruce Snyder <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > There is a file at the following URL named
>>>> DRAFT-ActiveMQ-board-report.txt,
>>>> > can we use this for gathering contributions to the board report?
>>>> >
>>>> > https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/tree/main/src/team/reports
>>>> >
>>>> > If not this file, please provide a suggestion.
>>>> >
>>>> > Bruce
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 12:57 PM Justin Bertram <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > There's an ASF tool where you can add the release information [1]
>>>> and that
>>>> > > information is then available to Bruce and he just copies and
>>>> pastes it
>>>> > > into the report before he submits it. So the release process should
>>>> include
>>>> > > using this tool.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Justin
>>>> > >
>>>> > > [1] https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?activemq
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:15 AM Clebert Suconic <
>>>> > > [email protected]>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > fine... we could start filling the draft as releases are done, as
>>>> part
>>>> > > > of the release procedure?
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 10:39 AM Bruce Snyder <
>>>> [email protected]>
>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > I would rather employ the prepare-draft-in-site-git-repo
>>>> approach
>>>> > > because
>>>> > > > > it will result in a report format already prepared that can be
>>>> > > > copy/pasted
>>>> > > > > directly to Whimsy. I did not take steps to implement this
>>>> approach as
>>>> > > > > there were some strong opinions about it previously. If we'd
>>>> like to
>>>> > > > > utilize this approach, I'm all for it.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Releases are already noted somewhere so they appear in the
>>>> Whimsy stats
>>>> > > > > already.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Bruce
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:21 AM Clebert Suconic <
>>>> > > > [email protected]>
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > > Perhaps we should include a step in our release procedure to
>>>> update
>>>> > > > some
>>>> > > > > > document on every release we make?   Like quarter releases on
>>>> our
>>>> > > > website
>>>> > > > > > so it’s always ready. (Which is most of what we do for the
>>>> report )
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 4:58 AM Robbie Gemmell <
>>>> > > > [email protected]>
>>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > Are we dropping the prepare-draft-in-site-git-repo approach
>>>> > > > previously
>>>> > > > > > > discussed and put in place then used for the last report,
>>>> and
>>>> > > > > > > switching entirely to email?
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > I dont really mind which approach is used, as I said
>>>> personally I
>>>> > > > just
>>>> > > > > > > use email elsewhere, but asking to know whether to delete
>>>> the stale
>>>> > > > > > > file.
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > Robbie
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 05:11, Bruce Snyder <
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > Please consider this message a call for contribution to
>>>> the next
>>>> > > > board
>>>> > > > > > > > report!
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > Kindly reply to this conversation with your contributions.
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > Bruce
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:37 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>> > > > [email protected]
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > Hi Bruce,
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > I think replying to a "call for report" email is OK.
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > Regards
>>>> > > > > > > > > JB
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:27 PM Bruce Snyder <
>>>> > > > [email protected]
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > > I just realized that we were notified about our board
>>>> report
>>>> > > > too
>>>> > > > > > > late to
>>>> > > > > > > > > > even submit the report as the meeting is scheduled to
>>>> take
>>>> > > > place
>>>> > > > > > > > > tomorrow.
>>>> > > > > > > > > > So, let's plan on submitting it for next month's ASF
>>>> board
>>>> > > > meeting.
>>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > > How do we want to go about gathering the board report
>>>> > > > contributions
>>>> > > > > > > for
>>>> > > > > > > > > > this and future reports? GitHub? Responses to this
>>>> message?
>>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > > Bruce
>>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > > --
>>>> > > > > > > > > > perl -e 'print
>>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>>>> > > > > > > );'
>>>> > > > > > > > > > http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > --
>>>> > > > > > > > perl -e 'print
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>>>> > > > > > );'
>>>> > > > > > > > http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > --
>>>> > > > > > Clebert Suconic
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > --
>>>> > > > > perl -e 'print
>>>> > > > >
>>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>>>> > > );'
>>>> > > > > http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > --
>>>> > > > Clebert Suconic
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > perl -e 'print
>>>> > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>>>> );'
>>>> > http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> perl -e 'print
>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>>> http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> perl -e 'print
>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>> http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>


-- 
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>

Reply via email to