Fully agree +1 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 7:21 PM Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I think the most important part of the statement is "Both are active, both > have a roadmap, both have users/community." > > So +1 for the PR. > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org > francois.pa...@openobject.fr > > Le 12/11/2024 à 11:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi folks, > > > > A few months ago, I created a PR for website: > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/127 > > > > The purpose is to remove the "flavors" section on the homepage, as I > > received questions from users (they are confused by this section). > > Following ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.4 vote, I again received questions from > > users (different users) who are confused. > > > > As suggested by Justin on the PR, I'm bringing this discussion on the > > mailing list. > > > > From my standpoint, as a matter of fact, we have two sub-projects in > > the ActiveMQ TLP umbreless: > > - Artemis > > - ActiveMQ Classic > > Both are active, both have a roadmap, both have users/community. > > I don't see one replacing the other, or at least the users will decide. > > So, I think we have to be clear for our users about that, from a > > community perspective. > > > > I propose to remove the section as proposed in the PR, and also > > clearly state that both subprojects are active, the users have the > > choice. > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@activemq.apache.org > > For further information, visit:https://activemq.apache.org/contact > > > > >