Fully agree

+1
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 7:21 PM Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I think the most important part of the statement is "Both are active, both
> have a roadmap, both have users/community."
>
> So +1 for the PR.
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
> francois.pa...@openobject.fr
>
> Le 12/11/2024 à 11:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > A few months ago, I created a PR for website:
> > https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/127
> >
> > The purpose is to remove the "flavors" section on the homepage, as I
> > received questions from users (they are confused by this section).
> > Following ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.4 vote, I again received questions from
> > users (different users) who are confused.
> >
> > As suggested by Justin on the PR, I'm bringing this discussion on the
> > mailing list.
> >
> >  From my standpoint, as a matter of fact, we have two sub-projects in
> > the ActiveMQ TLP umbreless:
> > - Artemis
> > - ActiveMQ Classic
> > Both are active, both have a roadmap, both have users/community.
> > I don't see one replacing the other, or at least the users will decide.
> > So, I think we have to be clear for our users about that, from a
> > community perspective.
> >
> > I propose to remove the section as proposed in the PR, and also
> > clearly state that both subprojects are active, the users have the
> > choice.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@activemq.apache.org
> > For further information, visit:https://activemq.apache.org/contact
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to