+1 on this too. It removes confusion and promotes contributions to both sub-projects.
Regards, Patrick ________________________________ From: Samir Boudjebla <samboudje...@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 9:47:03 AM To: dev@activemq.apache.org <dev@activemq.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Remove "flavors" section on the website +1 Thank you, JB, for raising this. I agree that removing the "flavors" section would streamline the homepage and reduce confusion, especially for new users. The PR proposal to clearly state that both ActiveMQ Artemis and ActiveMQ Classic are active, with distinct roadmaps, strikes a good balance by clarifying options without added complexity. This approach will enhance clarity for the community and reinforce that both projects remain fully viable choices for users. ________________________________ From: Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> Sent: November 13, 2024 07:37 To: dev@activemq.apache.org <dev@activemq.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Remove "flavors" section on the website Seems reasonable to remove it to me. On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 10:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > A few months ago, I created a PR for website: > https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/127<https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/127> > > The purpose is to remove the "flavors" section on the homepage, as I > received questions from users (they are confused by this section). > Following ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.4 vote, I again received questions from > users (different users) who are confused. > > As suggested by Justin on the PR, I'm bringing this discussion on the > mailing list. > > From my standpoint, as a matter of fact, we have two sub-projects in > the ActiveMQ TLP umbreless: > - Artemis > - ActiveMQ Classic > Both are active, both have a roadmap, both have users/community. > I don't see one replacing the other, or at least the users will decide. > So, I think we have to be clear for our users about that, from a > community perspective. > > I propose to remove the section as proposed in the PR, and also > clearly state that both subprojects are active, the users have the > choice. > > Thoughts ? > > Regards > JB > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org > For further information, visit: > https://activemq.apache.org/contact<https://activemq.apache.org/contact> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@activemq.apache.org For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact<https://activemq.apache.org/contact>
