IIRC, at one points ActiveMQ was able to pass higher than 90% of the TCK for JMS 1.1. It may require special config on certain destinations (for things like priority that are disabled by default, etc).
Please make a GH issue to track the failing tests, I’m happy to help configure a TCK-ready activemq.xml config. > On Feb 24, 2026, at 2:01 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi team, > > I've been trying to set up the Jakarta Messaging 3.1 TCK on Apache > ActiveMQ. I should have a PR ready by tomorrow. It won't pass all the tests > of course, so it won't run on any CI for the moment. But it's interesting > to get a bit more coverage on ActiveMQ and also good to help filling the > gaps. > > I'm not sure if there is any willingness to become a > compatible implementation listed on the Jakarta website, but it won't hurt > either. > > We are currently at 90%. My experience on various TCK work is that the last > tests usually are harder to get to pass. > > I'll keep you posted tomorrow when I know more about the first runs. > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
