Awesome, I think I created sub-issues in the global TCK issue in Github. You might have it already, otherwise, please create one so we can track the work. Let me know if I can help. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 3:43 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a PR for message delay feature that we can go with without updating > OpenWire protocol. > > I’ll refresh it and get it ready for 6.3.0 > > > On Feb 25, 2026, at 12:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Jean-Louis, > > > > Thanks for your work on this, as we discussed offline. > > > > It is great to have this for two main reasons: > > > > 1. It provides a clear assessment of our current Jakarta Messaging 3.1 > > support and identifies the remaining gaps. > > 2. It gives us the opportunity to be listed as a compatible > implementation > > on the Jakarta website. > > > > I am moving forward with the receiveBody() implementation, so I estimate > we > > are currently between 88% and 92%. Some remaining parts will require more > > significant effort, such as durable subscribers, which require updates to > > the OpenWire protocol and KahaDB internals. > > > > If we can make the TCK runnable via a Maven profile, that would be > > excellent, as it would allow us to run it on the CI on a weekly basis. > > > > Thanks again! > > > > Regards, > > JB > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 9:02 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi team, > >> > >> I've been trying to set up the Jakarta Messaging 3.1 TCK on Apache > >> ActiveMQ. I should have a PR ready by tomorrow. It won't pass all the > tests > >> of course, so it won't run on any CI for the moment. But it's > interesting > >> to get a bit more coverage on ActiveMQ and also good to help filling the > >> gaps. > >> > >> I'm not sure if there is any willingness to become a > >> compatible implementation listed on the Jakarta website, but it won't > hurt > >> either. > >> > >> We are currently at 90%. My experience on various TCK work is that the > last > >> tests usually are harder to get to pass. > >> > >> I'll keep you posted tomorrow when I know more about the first runs. > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > > >
