Hi all, I pushed some minor fixes for sed on mac and to set the local to en_US because for instance it does not work with number in France ;-) Here are the results so far
[javatest.batch] ******************************************************************************** [javatest.batch] Number of tests completed: 903 (799 passed, 103 failed, 1 with errors) [javatest.batch] Number of tests remaining: 0 [javatest.batch] ******************************************************************************** [javatest.batch] Completed running 903 tests. [javatest.batch] Number of Tests Passed = 799 [javatest.batch] Number of Tests Failed = 103 [javatest.batch] Number of Tests with Errors = 1 [javatest.batch] ******************************************************************************** I'll do some triage and create issues for it. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 7:12 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jean-Louis, > > Thanks for your work on this, as we discussed offline. > > It is great to have this for two main reasons: > > 1. It provides a clear assessment of our current Jakarta Messaging 3.1 > support and identifies the remaining gaps. > 2. It gives us the opportunity to be listed as a compatible implementation > on the Jakarta website. > > I am moving forward with the receiveBody() implementation, so I estimate we > are currently between 88% and 92%. Some remaining parts will require more > significant effort, such as durable subscribers, which require updates to > the OpenWire protocol and KahaDB internals. > > If we can make the TCK runnable via a Maven profile, that would be > excellent, as it would allow us to run it on the CI on a weekly basis. > > Thanks again! > > Regards, > JB > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 9:02 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi team, > > > > I've been trying to set up the Jakarta Messaging 3.1 TCK on Apache > > ActiveMQ. I should have a PR ready by tomorrow. It won't pass all the > tests > > of course, so it won't run on any CI for the moment. But it's interesting > > to get a bit more coverage on ActiveMQ and also good to help filling the > > gaps. > > > > I'm not sure if there is any willingness to become a > > compatible implementation listed on the Jakarta website, but it won't > hurt > > either. > > > > We are currently at 90%. My experience on various TCK work is that the > last > > tests usually are harder to get to pass. > > > > I'll keep you posted tomorrow when I know more about the first runs. > > > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > >
