I still have some small fixes to push to the branch I started (see my last PR). It's running on my mac currently. I'll add the numbers tomorrow and create the github issues for it. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 11:57 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote: > IIRC, at one points ActiveMQ was able to pass higher than 90% of the TCK > for JMS 1.1. It may require special config on certain destinations (for > things like priority that are disabled by default, etc). > > Please make a GH issue to track the failing tests, I’m happy to help > configure a TCK-ready activemq.xml config. > > > On Feb 24, 2026, at 2:01 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi team, > > > > I've been trying to set up the Jakarta Messaging 3.1 TCK on Apache > > ActiveMQ. I should have a PR ready by tomorrow. It won't pass all the > tests > > of course, so it won't run on any CI for the moment. But it's interesting > > to get a bit more coverage on ActiveMQ and also good to help filling the > > gaps. > > > > I'm not sure if there is any willingness to become a > > compatible implementation listed on the Jakarta website, but it won't > hurt > > either. > > > > We are currently at 90%. My experience on various TCK work is that the > last > > tests usually are harder to get to pass. > > > > I'll keep you posted tomorrow when I know more about the first runs. > > > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > > >
