I think AIP is a proposal which is back by a PR. Hence it should consider a
major code change(normal code change shouldn't need a AIP).


On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 2:54 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote:

> There was a post about this AIP on 1 Febuary (but no replies other than
> me), and AIPs are not code changes so the point about veto doesn't apply
> here I don't think?.
>
> But yes, I think the rough idea of there should be apparent consensus
> before a vote is called makes sense. I  was using "Lazy consensus" in
> calling my vote as no one else spoke up on the discussion thread ;)
>
> -ash
>
>
> > On 21 Feb 2019, at 20:22, Tao Feng <fengta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Please correct me if I am wrong. I think normally it starts with a
> > [DISCUSS] email thread for all the technical details discussion. If
> > everyone aligns, we could move to the vote thread. Here are some
> guidelines
> > found on the apache website(
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html)
> > . A few points captured:
> >
> > ```
> > A code-modification proposal may be stopped dead in its tracks by a -1
> vote
> > by a qualified voter. This constitutes a veto, and it cannot be overruled
> > nor overridden by anyone. Vetos stand until and unless withdrawn by their
> > casters.
> > ```
> > I think we should make sure everyone is aligned in the discuss thread
> > before we move to vote thread. WDYT.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:26 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm about to send a vote email for the first AIP that I (hope) is going
> to
> >> be a simple and straight forward one to accept.
> >>
> >> Since we haven't defined the process of how/when we vote on AIPs I'm
> >> making it up as we go along :)
> >>
> >> Some points:
> >>
> >> - A failed vote on an AIP is not the same as rejecting the AIP, it could
> >> just need more refinement.
> >> - a proposal requires three positive votes and no negative ones in order
> >> to pass
> >> - I've picked a some-what random time of 1 week for AIP votes (compared
> to
> >> the 3 days for release votes)
> >> - members of the community are encouraged to cast votes.
> >>
> >> If no one objects to these "rules" I'll write them up in the wiki along
> >> with a template email to use for AIP votes.
> >>
> >> -ash
>
>

Reply via email to