One 1 concern I have with forwarding everything to Dev would the "how-to" question.
For example: how I can integrate LDAP with Airflow? Or How can enable RBAC UI etc. Forwarding those to "users" might make more sense I feel but I am very open to suggestions and discussions. Regards, Kaxil On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 15:10 Tomasz Urbaszek <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Kaxil for starting new this thread! > > In my opinion, we should use dev@ for this integration. I am afraid that > using slack@ with selective forwarding in a bidirectional way will be > hard to achieve. > > In my opinion, the most important aspect of this integration is to bring > devlist discussion to a wider audience (devlist -> slack). If someone wants > to take part in the discussion then he/she can use mail or slack. > > One point I am still wondering is, does this integration allow Slack users > to respond to selected threads/messages? > > Tomek > > On 2020/01/27 09:30:26, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > While discussing on how to be more welcoming for the community, Tomek > found > > something really interesting on the devcomm list. > > > > Tomek's email: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0192c6932e1bae8300ef50ac9284d7c609bca022bb7edc83ed35bf1d%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > > > > "We have set up Mahout's slack space to forward directly to > > > [email protected]. We will now be able to plan publicly on slack. > This > > > a bi-directional connection, all messages to [email protected] > will > > > show up in Slack. No one will be left out of planning." > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbc1c1c2a289accb40e7e3967f7c08213f13fea46013f73cf881c74c0%40%3Cdev.community.apache.org%3E > > > > > > I think this is a very good find. > > > > We can do something similar. > > 2 things I have in mind: > > > > 1) A separate list [email protected] where we forward all Slack > > communication > > > > 2) A selective forward (filter certain channels to different list). Some > of > > them can go to dev@ but some belong to users@ list > > > > > > I see (1) being more relevant. > > > > I have separated that thread to discuss the specifics of Slack as this > can > > be independent of that thread. > > > > What do you guys think about this? > > > > Regards, > > Kaxil > > >
