How do you propose to address this Ash (and _we_ especially) ? Any idea how
_we_ can do it?

J.

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:54 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> -1 from me.
>
> I would favour individual small releases, not a back-port big blob.
> And I would also rather _we_ put the effort in to working out
> compatibility issues/breaking changes in providers (and to be honest
> avoiding them in most cases) rather than making our users do this
> guess/experience breakages from upgrades.
> On Feb 18 2020, at 9:49 pm, Kamil Breguła <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > CalVer is a fantasstic idea.
> > https://calver.org/
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:37 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Since we are close to run tests for backport packages at GCP I would
> like
> > > to start vote on the release process for backport packages.
> > >
> > > The vote will last till Friday, 21st of Feb, 11pm CET.
> > > The proposal is to release one single backport "providers" package for
> now
> > > with Calver scheme:
> > > *apache-airflow-providers-backport-1.10-YYYY.MM.DD*
> > >
> > > The conditions for release are:
> > > 1) Unit tests are passing in master
> > > 2) Backport packages are installable on latest released airflow 1.10.x
> > > (currently 1.10.9) with python 3.6 and 3.7.
> > > 3) Compatibility matrix is produced for tested providers (using system
> > > tests where applicable)
> > > 4) Only PMCs have binding votes on the release as with Apache Airflow
> > > official releases.
> > >
> > > Committers have a binding vote but everyone from the community is
> > > encouraged to cast an advisory vote.
> > >
> > > Consider this my biding +1 vote.
> > > J.
> > > --
> > > Jarek Potiuk
> > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
> > >
> > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
> >
> >
>
>

-- 

Jarek Potiuk
Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer

M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
[image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>

Reply via email to