I should clarify, my -1 here is not a veto.
-ash
On Feb 19 2020, at 9:40 am, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since we have -1 from Ash. The vote is cancelled for now. I have some ideas
> to address Ash's concern and will continue the discussion in the
> corresponding [PROPOSAL] thread here:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf6f2de8056b00ad084c96a9428670c14421a89ba2bbbd362d833bb50%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>
>
> J.
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:46 AM Driesprong, Fokko <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Where is the code? I don't know what I'm voting for. If we want to do this,
> > why aren't we cherry-picking this in the branch? I feel like I'm
> > missing something.
> >
> > Cheers, Fokko
> > Op di 18 feb. 2020 om 23:14 schreef Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]
> > > :
> >
> >
> > > How do you propose to address this Ash (and _we_ especially) ? Any idea
> > how
> > > _we_ can do it?
> > >
> > > J.
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:54 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > -1 from me.
> > > > I would favour individual small releases, not a back-port big blob.
> > > > And I would also rather _we_ put the effort in to working out
> > > > compatibility issues/breaking changes in providers (and to be honest
> > > > avoiding them in most cases) rather than making our users do this
> > > > guess/experience breakages from upgrades.
> > > > On Feb 18 2020, at 9:49 pm, Kamil Breguła <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > CalVer is a fantasstic idea.
> > > > > https://calver.org/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:37 PM Jarek Potiuk <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since we are close to run tests for backport packages at GCP I
> > would
> > > > like
> > > > > > to start vote on the release process for backport packages.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The vote will last till Friday, 21st of Feb, 11pm CET.
> > > > > > The proposal is to release one single backport "providers" package
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > for
> > > > now
> > > > > > with Calver scheme:
> > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-backport-1.10-YYYY.MM.DD*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The conditions for release are:
> > > > > > 1) Unit tests are passing in master
> > > > > > 2) Backport packages are installable on latest released airflow
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > 1.10.x
> > > > > > (currently 1.10.9) with python 3.6 and 3.7.
> > > > > > 3) Compatibility matrix is produced for tested providers (using
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > system
> > > > > > tests where applicable)
> > > > > > 4) Only PMCs have binding votes on the release as with Apache
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > Airflow
> > > > > > official releases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Committers have a binding vote but everyone from the community is
> > > > > > encouraged to cast an advisory vote.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Consider this my biding +1 vote.
> > > > > > J.
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Jarek Potiuk
> > > > > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
> > > > > >
> > > > > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> > > > > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jarek Potiuk
> > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
> > >
> > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jarek Potiuk
> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>
> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>
