+1 for the idea. Should Airflow k8s operator be included in those discussions?
Also, I'm not sure if we have any more need to have autoscaling-only SIG? Should we rename the existing one? T. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 4:43 PM Daniel Imberman <daniel.imber...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Airflowers! > Recently we've had some pretty great success with the SIG-Autoscaling and > SIG-DAG-Serialization groups. In this same vein, I'd like to propose a > SIG-Kubernetes group where we can discuss all efforts to improve the > airflow Kubernetes story. > We would meet once a month and discuss initiatives like the airflow helm > chart, airflow custom controller, official docker image, and writing > documentation for best practices on Kubernetes. This could also be a great > forum for users to discuss their production experiences and use-cases. > > Would love any thoughts and feedback on this subject :). -- Tomasz Urbaszek Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Software Engineer M: +48 505 628 493 <+48505628493> E: tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com <tomasz.urbasz...@polidea.com> Unique Tech Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work>
