+1 would love to listen in on these On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:52 AM Tomasz Urbaszek < tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com> wrote:
> +1 for the idea. Should Airflow k8s operator be included in those > discussions? > > Also, I'm not sure if we have any more need to have autoscaling-only SIG? > Should we rename the existing one? > > T. > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 4:43 PM Daniel Imberman <daniel.imber...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Hello Airflowers! > > Recently we've had some pretty great success with the SIG-Autoscaling and > > SIG-DAG-Serialization groups. In this same vein, I'd like to propose a > > SIG-Kubernetes group where we can discuss all efforts to improve the > > airflow Kubernetes story. > > We would meet once a month and discuss initiatives like the airflow helm > > chart, airflow custom controller, official docker image, and writing > > documentation for best practices on Kubernetes. This could also be a > great > > forum for users to discuss their production experiences and use-cases. > > > > Would love any thoughts and feedback on this subject :). > > > > -- > > Tomasz Urbaszek > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Software Engineer > > M: +48 505 628 493 <+48505628493> > E: tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com <tomasz.urbasz...@polidea.com> > > Unique Tech > Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work> >
